Monitoring
Surface potentially unauthorised uses or rights conflicts for review.
Proactive anti-piracy tools keep your music safe across the open web.
Detection, verification, review and controlled rights enforcement.
VISUAL 12 MOTION READYUnique hashes detect unauthorized re-uploads automatically.
Continuous monitoring for pirated copies across platforms.
Automated and manual takedown requests under applicable law.
Monetize claims on YouTube instead of just blocking.
Anti-piracy and rights management are presented as review-driven workflows. Potential matches, ownership information, licensing context and permitted actions should be checked before any enforcement decision is made.
Surface potentially unauthorised uses or rights conflicts for review.
Associate content matches with the relevant reference asset and ownership record.
Confirm the authorised rights holder, territory and service scope before an action is taken.
Compare overlapping claims or license information when the rights state is not immediately clear.
Represent review, claim, takedown request, monetization, block or whitelist states only when those actions are authorised and supported.
Keep status changes understandable so teams can see how a rights issue progressed.
A match alone does not prove that an enforcement action is appropriate. The workflow makes room for ownership, license and territory review.
The secondary rights visual shows how ownership, license period, platform permissions and territory rules can influence distribution clearance.
No. A detected match should be reviewed against the verified rights and service scope before any action is considered.
Yes. Licensing and distribution permissions may vary by territory according to the approved rights information.
The workflow should surface the conflict for review rather than automatically choosing a rights holder.
Rights and licensing status can be used as part of the distribution-readiness review before content is routed.
Ownership, license, territory and platform-permission control.
VISUAL 25 MOTION READYRights enforcement should be accurate, reviewable and tied to legitimate ownership information. The CRY anti-piracy presentation therefore separates monitoring, matching, verification, review and possible action so the website does not imply automatic or unsupported claims against third-party content.
Start with a documented content owner, rights holder or authorised representative record.
Keep the approved media reference attached to the ownership and licence context used for monitoring.
Surface potential matches as review items rather than treating every similarity as confirmed infringement.
Compare the detected content with ownership, licence, whitelist and territory information before action.
Handle overlapping or conflicting rights records as a separate review state.
Use only the action allowed by the account scope, platform policy and verified rights context.
Record the reason, status and result of a rights action for later support and governance.
Continue monitoring eligible references while respecting updates, licences, whitelists and ownership changes.
Explore the service that fits your catalog, submit a business or creator application, or contact the CRY DIGITAL Media team about distribution, CMS, rights, channel management and platform operations.